Contact Us
Search
Sign In / Register FREE
Directory Home
Bunkerworld
Portworld
OceanIntelligence
Recently Seen
California Air Resources Board (ARB)
CMA-CGM SA
Vancouver BC News
C
alifornia Air Resources Board (ARB)
USA
. .
Credit Rating
CLICK HERE TO
ORDER YOUR REPORT
Telephone
+1 916 322 2990
Fax
+1 916 323 1045
Address
1001 I Street
Sacramento
CA 95814
USA
Postal Address
P.O.Box 2815
Sacramento
CA 95812
USA
Personnel
There are
29
personnel contact listings available for this office.
Access to company personnel listings is only available to subscribers.
CLICK HERE
to subscribe now.
Related Company News
19 Feb 10
'Huge' technical challenge of meeting greener fuel regulation
16 Feb 10
The link between ship emissions and premature deaths
21 Jan 10
Emission benefits of hull paint stripping device
13 Jan 10
Commercial Harbor Craft regulatory reminder
11 Jan 10
A look back at 2009 (part 3)
08 Jan 10
California postpones clean air technology funds
04 Jan 10
A look back at 2009 (Part 2)
31 Dec 09
A look back at 2009 (Part 1)
17 Dec 09
California shore power regulation begins January
16 Dec 09
PMSA maintains ARB is 'overstepping its legal authority'
15 Dec 09
Global agreement alone cannot solve climate change
11 Dec 09
Exclusive: PMSA granted appeal on low sulphur fuel rule decision
01 Dec 09
New problems as ships avoid low sulphur zone
27 Nov 09
Industry backs delay on California low sulphur fuel rule
24 Nov 09
Switching to biofuel cuts particulate matter
10 Nov 09
More ships losing power as sulphur rules tighten
27 Oct 09
Fleet owners claim California emission credits
22 Oct 09
Providing financial incentives for fuel efficient engines
19 Oct 09
Should the California Air Resources Board (ARB) suspend enforcement of the Low Sulphur Fuel Rule?
19 Oct 09
Decision to delay GHG market-based measures considered 'inappropriate'
16 Oct 09
California fuel rule encounters difficulties
14 Oct 09
Grants available under US EPA's Clean Diesel Campaign
01 Oct 09
California clarifies low-sulphur safety exemption
24 Sep 09
Environmental policies 'cannot compromise safety'
16 Sep 09
Mobile shore power system claims big emissions savings
11 Sep 09
Chance to voice opinions ahead of Copenhagen
03 Sep 09
Carbon capture at the Port of Rotterdam
04 Aug 09
Schwarzenegger backs cap-and-trade meeting
30 Jul 09
Switching fuels cuts some emissions, little CO2 benefit
29 Jul 09
Vessel operators would 're-route to avoid speed reduction scheme'
29 Jul 09
Questions raised over particulate matter
14 Jul 09
California fuel rule: Engine problems reported
02 Jul 09
Solar-powered car carrier arrives in California
02 Jul 09
PMSA concerned over patchwork regulations
01 Jul 09
California low-sulphur fuel rules come into force
01 Jul 09
Challenge to California fuel rules fails
26 Jun 09
Setback for challenge to California low-sulphur rule
25 Jun 09
Hearing on low-sulphur fuel rule to begin
17 Jun 09
USCG issues fuel switching safety alert
15 Jun 09
Deadline for California's vessel fleet plan
05 Jun 09
Industry urges delay in California low sulphur fuel rule
03 Jun 09
California low-sulphur fuel rule to become legally effective
27 May 09
BP fined $1 million for fuel violations
27 May 09
Coast Guard warns LS fuel could lead to 'equipment failures'
06 May 09
Advisory on California fuel rule
05 May 09
Low-sulphur fuel rule full steam ahead
04 May 09
Industry backs Emissions Trading Scheme
28 Apr 09
PMSA files lawsuit against California fuel rule
13 Apr 09
Oakland port moves ahead with emission reduction plan
11 Mar 09
Fuel incentive scheme given a boost
06 Mar 09
ARB extend deadline for Commercial Harbor Craft report
06 Mar 09
'Coherent approach needed' to achieve emission reductions
05 Mar 09
Low carbon fuel standards gain momentum
27 Feb 09
Environmental concerns make shipping a 'big risk', BP says
19 Feb 09
Low-sulphur fuel regulation moves one step closer
18 Feb 09
Cruise lines urged to reduce carbon footprint
13 Feb 09
Complacency on environmental targets 'a grave mistake'
28 Jan 09
Concerns over conflicting emission fees
14 Jan 09
Shipowners get help to comply with regulations
31 Dec 08
New Year, new environmental challenges
30 Dec 08
US shore power regulation 'will not deter shippers'
29 Dec 08
Cold-ironing plans for US East Coast
23 Dec 08
Survey to determine economic impact of slow steaming
22 Dec 08
Tugboat fleet to receive cleaner, fuel efficient engines
19 Dec 08
Lower emissions from green growth port strategy
17 Dec 08
Shipping emissions regulations could be 'good for business'
10 Dec 08
US cold-ironing regulation begins January
26 Nov 08
Port receives shore power funding
26 Nov 08
Environment group call for 'repeal' on bunker tax exemption
22 Oct 08
Cold ironing regulation in final stage
21 Oct 08
California distillate bunker regulation gains momentum
16 Oct 08
ARB to outline GHG emission reduction plan
23 Sep 08
California pushes Clean Air Act
09 Sep 08
ARB could 'enforce' speed limits
04 Sep 08
Industry supports scrubbers in California
25 Aug 08
Stringent emissions regulations open for review
19 Aug 08
Invitation for input on shipping regulations
19 Aug 08
High sulphur bunker fuel under fire again
14 Aug 08
California MGO drops below $1,000
06 Aug 08
California poised to add container charge to clean up pollution
06 Aug 08
Ports plan price gap narrows
31 Jul 08
Little support for biofuels, industry says
31 Jul 08
Scrubber maker upbeat despite Californian setback
28 Jul 08
MDO added to ports fuel incentive programme
24 Jul 08
California mandates distillate bunkers
21 Jul 08
Grants for emission reduction technology
17 Jul 08
'Shining example' in environmental commitment
08 Jul 08
Recognition for tugboat company's environmental focus
07 Jul 08
Port 'encouraged' by fuel incentive scheme response
01 Jul 08
California's emissions rules raise concerns
12 Jun 08
New moves in the United States to limit use of IFO
26 May 08
Bunker prices to impact shipping, poll says
13 May 08
California to push for Emissions Control Area
08 May 08
California halts engine fuel rule enforcement
02 May 08
California mulls new auxiliary engine fuel rules
25 Apr 08
Revised Annex VI 'not enough' for California
22 Apr 08
Court rejects fuel rules yet again
16 Apr 08
California targets greenhouse gas emissions
09 Apr 08
Ports present fuel incentive scheme
26 Mar 08
Port of Charleston supports emissions measures
25 Mar 08
Ports' distillate fuel plan is official
24 Mar 08
Oakland approves emissions strategy
21 Mar 08
Oakland looks at fees to reduce emissions
20 Mar 08
Port fuel incentives won't replace new rules
18 Mar 08
Ports to offer distillate incentives
11 Mar 08
California to enforce struck-down fuel rules
06 Mar 08
Court decision to affect future fuel rules
04 Mar 08
$2.2 million fine dropped from draft cold ironing rules
03 Mar 08
Legal reasoning upheld in emissions court case
28 Feb 08
New blow for California's sulphur rules
14 Feb 08
US Senate discusses emissions bill
08 Feb 08
Main engine fuel rules nearly ready
07 Feb 08
Port faces pollution lawsuit
05 Feb 08
Ports a 'perfect storm' of pollution
04 Feb 08
New cold ironing rules imminent
01 Feb 08
More support for emissions trading
21 Jan 08
Bunker sales tax in California mooted again
14 Jan 08
California ups ship emissions ante
31 Dec 07
MARPOL law awaits US action
18 Dec 07
Terminal expansion sees 'green' ship measures
07 Dec 07
Board poised to approve new cold ironing rules
30 Nov 07
ARB chair addresses World Bank
27 Nov 07
Health benefits of clean fuel 'nebulous at best'
22 Nov 07
NYK gives cold ironing seal of approval
30 Oct 07
Ship measures included in California emissions act
25 Oct 07
California fuel rules back on
25 Oct 07
Long Beach forum to tackle shipping's CO2 emissions
10 Oct 07
Industry divided over emissions legal ruling
09 Oct 07
Port counts cost of ship emissions
03 Oct 07
Tough emissions talk in California
02 Oct 07
California plans two-step distillate fuel implementation
26 Sep 07
Slow down, save the whales
24 Sep 07
California seeks to enforce banned fuel rules
17 Sep 07
California pushes on despite legal setback
10 Sep 07
Industry rejects CO2 arguments
06 Sep 07
Arguments not 'persuasive' in bunker fuel court case
31 Aug 07
Court strikes down California bunker rules
21 Aug 07
California cold ironing delayed
17 Aug 07
California bunker sales tax exemption questioned
16 Aug 07
Northwest bunker rules on public meeting agenda
15 Aug 07
Shipowner green upgrade with '200 metres of piping'
13 Aug 07
'Environmental Pollution Agency' blamed for slow progress
08 Aug 07
Limited CO2 penalty from distillate ship fuel switch
06 Aug 07
California shore power meeting delayed
02 Aug 07
Maersk favours US West Coast distillate
31 Jul 07
Engine-maker warnings over fuel switching
31 Jul 07
Public meeting for new US ship fuel legislation
25 Jul 07
'Feasible' 0.25% sulphur limit for distillate fuel
24 Jul 07
Fuel switching meeting covers feasibility, availability
17 Jul 07
Fuel switching meeting to hear industry views
13 Jul 07
California fuel switching 'feasible', industry says
11 Jul 07
California vessel speed, shore power meetings tomorrow
10 Jul 07
Maersk fuel switching 'very successful'
28 Jun 07
Industry organisations rally behind US proposal to the IMO
26 Jun 07
California: ARB invites input on Vessel Speed Reduction measure
22 Jun 07
Shore power consultation continues
15 Jun 07
California moves ahead with main engine regulations
07 Jun 07
De facto California SECA by 2009
01 Jun 07
Shore power: $1.5 million per tonne of emissions
31 May 07
Poll results: Shipping industry needs to do more
29 May 07
Distillate fuel in all US ports by 2010
28 May 07
California shore power switch for 2015
23 May 07
Ship main engine fuel rules on agenda
11 May 07
Shore power meeting to consider new California rules
08 May 07
New emissions technology test announced
04 Apr 07
California issues fuel mix directive
27 Mar 07
Annex VI close to law in US
20 Mar 07
California SECA mooted for 2010
16 Mar 07
APL, port receive environmental awards
05 Mar 07
Meeting to consider main engine fuel rules
26 Feb 07
Second cold ironing meeting to discuss new regulations
22 Feb 07
Ship survey queries low-sulphur fuel use
20 Feb 07
US seeks stricter Annex VI enforcement
09 Feb 07
Annex VI could threaten local pollution measures
30 Jan 07
Cruise line agrees to emissions controls
23 Jan 07
Evergreen shows off in California
15 Jan 07
No date yet for court case
15 Jan 07
Port offers clean fuel incentives
09 Jan 07
California plans further emissions controls
05 Jan 07
California ship survey questions distillate use
04 Jan 07
Houston to regulate distillate fuels
02 Jan 07
California fuel fees documents online
28 Dec 06
California claims ship engine jurisdiction
22 Dec 06
Port welcomes new ship fuel rules
21 Dec 06
Fuel rule start date clarified
20 Dec 06
New port pollution study launched
19 Dec 06
Lawsuit claims bunker rules 'unlawful'
18 Dec 06
APL tests new fuel technology
15 Dec 06
SECA website launched
14 Dec 06
Shipowners file legal challenge to California fuel rules
12 Dec 06
Auxiliary engine fuel rule conference call scheduled
08 Dec 06
ARB announces cold-ironing workgroup
01 Dec 06
Concern over California distillate sulphur levels
24 Nov 06
Ports detail $180 million cold ironing plans
22 Nov 06
California fuel rule exemption workshop scheduled
21 Nov 06
Clean ships conference announced
21 Nov 06
'Landmark' ship emissions controls approved in California
08 Nov 06
Ports seek ban on use of fuel oil bunkers
06 Nov 06
Port backs scrubber technology
03 Nov 06
Chemoil clarifies diesel fuel rule
24 Oct 06
California ports clean air plan due for release next week
05 Oct 06
Maersk touts distillate fuel use for entire California fleet
19 Sep 06
US explores feasibility of low-sulphur regulations
11 Sep 06
Working Group to tackle ship emissions
31 Aug 06
Cold ironing working group to be formed
25 Aug 06
Biodiesel offers cleaner ship fuel future
23 Aug 06
Long Beach ship emissions meeting scheduled
16 Aug 06
New fuel restriction advisory issued
26 Jul 06
US court decision may set pollution precedent
24 Jul 06
Shipping emissions and abatement subject of new studies
07 Jul 06
Legal review of ship fuel rule pending
03 Jul 06
LA to offer incentives to ships for cold ironing
30 Jun 06
PMSA supports emissions reduction plan
29 Jun 06
LA, Long Beach: 0.2% distillate fuel mandatory by end of 2006
27 Jun 06
New California port emissions plan signals historic cooperation
22 Jun 06
Texas supports California emissions rule
01 Jun 06
California extends auxiliary engine rule timeframe
29 May 06
Maersk adopts low-sulphur fuel
18 May 06
California updates ship emission law
03 May 06
Port signs 'landmark' green lease with shipowner
26 Apr 06
Engine fuel rule expected in two weeks
20 Apr 06
California endorses new emissions controls
19 Apr 06
Shipowners, port oppose Texas ship engine fuel law
18 Apr 06
US plans SECA following Annex VI ratification
06 Apr 06
EPA rewards Port of Los Angeles
04 Apr 06
Ship main engines to burn distillate fuel by 2010, report says
29 Mar 06
ARB seeks comments on emissions plan
21 Mar 06
Port rewards compliant shipowners with 'Green Flags'
15 Mar 06
Houston facing low-sulphur regulations
09 Mar 06
Cold ironing 'cost effective' for California
23 Feb 06
Shipowners protest fuel switching safety clause
22 Feb 06
Challenge to California low-sulphur law looming
16 Jan 06
Warning to bunker suppliers from US maritime lawyer
14 Dec 05
California ships face hefty emissions fines
13 Dec 05
Legal challenge to new California emissions rule
09 Dec 05
California adopts strict new bunker controls
08 Nov 05
Scrubbers necessary to meet California emissions regulations